Letters to the Editor
The BIOJ: Evolution or revolution?
Authors:
Jill Carlton ,
Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield
About Jill
PhD MMedSci (Orthoptics) BMedSci (Orthoptics)
Gemma E. Arblaster,
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield;
Academic Unit of Ophthalmology & Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
About Gemma E.
MSc, BMedSci (Hons) (Orthoptics)
Lindsey A. Hughes
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield
About Lindsey A.
BMedSci (Orthoptics)
Abstract
Whilst undertaking a descriptive study comparing the content of the BIOJ with two other clinical journals, a number of differences between the professional publications were observed.1 Some of these have been outlined; however, we feel other differences warrant further discussion amongst BIOS members.
How to Cite:
Carlton, J., Arblaster, G.E. and Hughes, L.A., 2012. The BIOJ: Evolution or revolution?. British and Irish Orthoptic Journal, 10, pp.66–67. DOI: http://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.77
Published on
01 Aug 2012.
Downloads
