Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: The BIOJ: Evolution or revolution?

Download

A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Letters to the Editor

The BIOJ: Evolution or revolution?

Authors:

Jill Carlton ,

Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield
About Jill

PhD MMedSci (Orthoptics) BMedSci (Orthoptics)

X close

Gemma E. Arblaster,

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield; Academic Unit of Ophthalmology & Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
About Gemma E.
MSc, BMedSci (Hons) (Orthoptics)
X close

Lindsey A. Hughes

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield
About Lindsey A.
BMedSci (Orthoptics)
X close

Abstract

Whilst undertaking a descriptive study comparing the content of the BIOJ with two other clinical journals, a number of differences between the professional publications were observed.1 Some of these have been outlined; however, we feel other differences warrant further discussion amongst BIOS members.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.77
How to Cite: Carlton, J., Arblaster, G.E. & Hughes, L.A., (2012). The BIOJ: Evolution or revolution? . British and Irish Orthoptic Journal . 10 , pp . 66–67 . DOI: http://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.77
1
Views
Published on 01 Aug 2012.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus